Subscribe to our Free Daily Headlines E-mail

To receive our Daily Headlines e-mail in your inbox every day, simply add your email below. A confirmation email will be sent to you!

Bill from Hamilton: Municipal sales tax for beach nourishment money

PortCityDaily.com is your source for free news and information in the Wilmington area.

Click here to read the entire bill and see updates on its progress.

A proposed new source of support for the beaches of North Carolina pends in the legislature.

A bill filed just under deadline in the N.C. General Assembly this month seeks to allow a new, half-percent sales tax that would raise proceeds for beach nourishment among other uses.

The state’s coastal towns have long desired a new fundraising mechanism that would free up or reduce the need to manage their shorelines with property tax money–particularly under a feeling that financial aid from the federal government is thinning away.

House Bill 962, filed April 17 by N.C. Rep. Susi Hamilton (D-New Hanover), would authorize municipalities to levy an additional half-percent local sales and use tax, which the state would collect and distribute to the participating towns monthly.

N.C. Rep. Susi Hamilton

In addition to beach nourishment, the revenue could help pay for streets and sidewalks, traffic signals, street lighting, signage, emergency services and “public events and festivals,” the bill says.

Local beach town officials are following the bill’s progress.

“Obviously, future funding for beach projects is uncertain,” said Wrightsville Beach Town Manager Tim Owens. “I think towns need as many tools as possible to be able to fund these types of projects.”

Owens pointed out that the only other local sources are the revenues from property and room-occupancy taxes, the latter charged to hotel stays and other accommodations. He said he had yet to analyze the revenue possibilities from the new sales tax proposal.

The strands of Carolina Beach and Kure Beach are now in the window of a federally supported beach nourishment, officially termed a “coastal storm damage reduction” effort. The $11.5 million project there is 65-percent federally funded; the rest is shared by the state and New Hanover County’s room-occupancy tax fund.

Wrightsville Beach expects a similar federally partnered project in winter 2013-14. While longer-term federal backing for beaches remains an unknown, the town is marked for $8 million from the president’s 2014 budget, which Owens noted must still go through the congressional approval process. State budget drafts in the N.C. General Assembly mark more than $1 million for the project.

In February, a consultant told the Town of Carolina Beach it should prepare for the possibility of losing federal and state funding support by saving about $550,000 or more per year in local funds specifically for beach nourishment.

“Estimates indicate that [Carolina Beach] would have to raise taxes more than 3 cents to meet projected costs in an emergency,” said Bruce Shell, Carolina Beach’s interim town manager, adding that a sales tax could be the better way. “A tax paid for by tourists makes a lot of sense rather than the property or residents, especially when you think of who enjoys the beaches.”

To implement the half-percent sales tax, if approved, the towns’ governing boards would have to adopt resolutions expressing the intent, after giving the public a chance to speak on the proposal.

The City of Wilmington’s legislative agenda had also noted the need for new revenue streams for “shoreline preservation, restoration and beach renourishment.” But during a planning session in November, Councilwoman Laura Padgett suggested that should also include a focus on the downtown riverfront.

“We don’t have a beach to renourish. We have totally supported our riverfront ourselves,” Padgett said at the time. “We have not gotten a dime from the beach renourishment funds to take care of this very expensive waterfront.”

The bill as written lacks apparent language to that end. It is in its first edition and sits currently in a House review committee.

City of Wilmington legislative liaison Tyler Newman said Monday the city is in conversation with Rep. Hamilton about adding broader “shoreline preservation” abilities to the bill that would allow proceeds for the riverfront.

Hamilton was not immediately available to discuss the bill Monday.

Complete details about the proposal are viewable here.

Ben Brown is a news reporter at Port City Daily. Reach him at ben.b@hometownwilmington.com or (910) 772-6335. On Twitter: @benbrownmedia

Share This Post

RSS
Posted by on April 29, 2013. Filed under Carolina Beach,General Assembly,Local News,Wilmington,Wrightsville Beach. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback to this entry

4 Responses to Bill from Hamilton: Municipal sales tax for beach nourishment money

  1. Vog46 Reply

    April 29, 2013 at 10:40 pm

    Here you go again City of Wilmington

    You see the main driver of tourism – the beaches – possibly getting their hand on some $ and YOU wish to call it shoreline development so you can get YOUR hand on it for River Walk maintenance.
    You built it – you pay for it.
    Maybe you can talk them into $ for the CC – thats on the shoreline too………

    Idiots

    Vog

  2. Common Sense Reply

    April 29, 2013 at 11:37 pm

    So the city says they want a little piece of the pie for the riverfront? LOL
    What a way to attempt to backdoor money for the city through beach renourishment Suzi. You should be ashamed of yourself. Why in the h … should anyone of us that is hurting financially prop up a beach for others to enjoy. If you nut jobs ran the government with competence you would keep spending under control.

  3. Vog46 Reply

    April 30, 2013 at 9:05 am

    Another money grab.
    however, Hamilton’s bill as written could NOT be used by the city:
    “for the purpose of widening the beach to benefit public recreational use and mitigating damage and
    erosion from storms to inland property and transportation routes.”
    Thats why Wilmington wants the bill re-written.
    But I wonder how the State will determine the amount collected under this program? It sounds like it could become burdensome to the state to differentiate the monies collected.

    “If the Secretary collects local sales or use taxes in a month and the taxes cannot be identified as being attributable to a particular taxing municipality, the Secretary shall allocate the taxes among the taxing municipalities in proportion to the amount of taxes collected in each municipality under this Article during that month and shall include them in the monthly distribution”

    So there’s the possibility of not being able to determine this with a degree of accuracy.
    I think the bill will die in the GOP legislature.
    But what Hamilton did was make a proposal and the Wilmington politicians “showed their hand” by jumping on the “I want some of that” bandwagon.

    The question I have is can a city like Wilmington NOT raise taxes and still collect the money? The answer appears to be “no”.
    I suspect the tax regulation re-write might include a substantial sales tax increase. Adding this tax to that might not be such a good idea.

    Vog

  4. lee Reply

    May 11, 2013 at 8:20 pm

    I’m disabled, don’t have a car and can’t even get to that beach since they decided not to even has bus service to it so why should I pay more taxes for it? They don’t want me coming there anyway. As far as I’m concerned if that beach wants more money for replacing sand they can raise their WB taxes….

    Hamilton can keep her fingers off my fixed income! It’s bad enough everything that gets money spent on it done around here is only for downtown people as it is. Wilmington is bigger than just downtown!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Website Development: Web Development Technology Partners, inc.